Nice! Makes me wonder about some other areas to explore:
- % of sites with immutable resources that are first party as opposed to external FB/Google resources
- file size and its relationship with immutability - eg are small files less likely to be cached this way because of their inexpensiveness?
- opportunity for long-lived resources (maxage > 1 year) to be converted to immutable - eg if they’re intended to be cached “forever” then why not make them immutable
- opportunity for “cache-busted” resources (
?version=1.2.3
) to be immutable, which are assumed to never change without also changing URL