# The Performance Impact of Cryptocurrency Mining on the Web

**URL:** <https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/the-performance-impact-of-cryptocurrency-mining-on-the-web/1126>\
**Category:** Analysis\
**Created:** [November 2, 2017, 4:18pm UTC](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/the-performance-impact-of-cryptocurrency-mining-on-the-web/1126 "2017-11-02T16:18:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doug\_sillars](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discuss.httparchive.org/doug_sillars/32/1297_2.png) [@doug\_sillars](https://discuss.httparchive.org/u/doug_sillars)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2017, 10:35pm UTC](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/the-performance-impact-of-cryptocurrency-mining-on-the-web/1126/10 "2017-12-12T22:35:07Z")

</div>

30 days later.

In the 10/15 run, there were 1,040 mobile sites with the CoinHive Javascript embedded. In the 11/15 HTTPArchive run, this has dropped to 759 - a drop of 27%!

Updating @paulcalvano’s query to 11/15 (and mobile instead of chrome), we see:  
 ![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/uploads/httparchive/original/2X/d/d7afbabe25b868ed8118131b0d6a539c0efb6504.png)

(there are probably lots of double requests for coinhive - hence the number being higher than 759)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/the-performance-impact-of-cryptocurrency-mining-on-the-web/1126)._
