# What is the distribution of 1st party vs 3rd party resources?

**URL:** <https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/what-is-the-distribution-of-1st-party-vs-3rd-party-resources/100>\
**Category:** Analysis\
**Created:** [November 8, 2013, 4:29am UTC](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/what-is-the-distribution-of-1st-party-vs-3rd-party-resources/100 "2013-11-08T04:29:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tkadlec](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discuss.httparchive.org/tkadlec/32/519_2.png) [@tkadlec](https://discuss.httparchive.org/u/tkadlec)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2017, 10:26pm UTC](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/what-is-the-distribution-of-1st-party-vs-3rd-party-resources/100/10 "2017-10-17T22:26:29Z")

</div>

Not sure if there’s a better approach since this was originally posted, but comparing apples to apples here, third party content (probably not too surprising) has really ballooned since @igrigorik first ran the query in Nov of 2013.

![49 PM](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/uploads/httparchive/original/1X/20c541204a488f8090c2886fbc0c83845a01ddc9.png)

The first party counts have stayed mostly the same, very slight variation. But 3rd party is definitely a different story. That’s 52.8% 3rd-party components at the median, now.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.httparchive.org/t/what-is-the-distribution-of-1st-party-vs-3rd-party-resources/100)._